Had Vivo charged 2300 or 2400, it would have been a very good choice competing instead with the Mi 9 SE.
Why is Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 better than MediaTek Helio G70.
HELIO P70 COMPARED TO SNAPDRAGON 675 SOFTWARE
64-bit allows more than 4GB, giving increased performance. Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table.
With that being said, I totally agree that having no-notch and a better battery life is very attractive. MediaTek Helio G70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675. A 32-bit operating system can only support up to 4GB of RAM. A much better selfie camera that pops up, a notch-less display, and most likely better battery life (675 likely less battery intensive, and it has a 400MaH battery).īoth devices have their compromises, but I think that many informed consumers would pick the Mi 9. MediaTek Helio P70 is the successor of Helio P60, however it has still ARM-based 4xCortex A-73 and 4xCortex A-53 cores, yet the greatest clock speed is. On the other hand, this new Vivo device does have some advantages.
This phone (specification wise) should have competed in price with the SE variant of Mi 9 (1999RMB).įor just 300RMB more the Mi 9 has a telephoto lens, SD855, an arguably sleeker look, USB-C (not that I really care), fast wireless charging, and an arguably better OS. However, Vivo has priced this in Mi 9 territory (2999RMB) and shot themselves in the foot. If this device were a few hundred RMB cheaper, it could be a competitive device. U30 and information about other HiSense models that have the same or similar CPU frequency.
0 kommentar(er)
